Wild Animals Doctrine

The Wild Animals doctrine, allows individuals, to use what shall be considered, lethal force, against wild animals, so long as they display aggressive behaviors, or enter residential areas.

The Wild Animal doctrine states “an individual, may use lethal force against a wild animal, so long as it’s presents and displays, aggressive mannerisms, toward the individual, or so long as it’s entered residential zones, and it’s failing to leave the residential zone.”

In order for the Wild Animals doctrine to be viable for use, the animal in question must either;

•Be displaying aggressive mannerisms towards an individual, whereby an attack from the animal is likely, or •The wild animal has entered a residential zone, the animal breed is known to show aggression, has been known to attack humans, and isn’t leaving the residential zone.

So long as either criteria above is met, an individual may exert lethal behavior onto said animal.

The action of neutralizing the animal, must be done in a humane, and non heinous way. A prolonged neutralizing of the animal, in a heinous way, will not be covered by the Wild Animals doctrine.

Note: An individual may be immune from LSMC 3 - Unlawful Discharge of a Weapon Within City Limits, so long as they have used the Wild Animals doctrine applicably, and met the criteria in order to exert lethal neutralization against an animal.

Additionally, should an individual prolong a heinous neutralization of an animal, they will not be legally protected by the Wild Animals doctrine. They shall be charged with [1] 19 - Animal Cruelty, and server a jail sentence.